 |
| A view of the damage done to the Western Ring of the Pentagon Building |
The old mystery conundrum, "Who killed Cock
Robin?", has promoted the creation of many attractively scheming works of
literary fiction over the last two centuries in which the creative authors have
endeavored to give the human mind puzzling homicide scenarios to contemplate
with the hope of solving. While a great many Americans spend countless hours of
their time reading Agatha Christie, James Patterson, Dashiell Hammett, and the
numerous other contemporary writers of murder mysteries, some grotesque
real-life homicides, 3000-plus, were committed on September 11, 2001, on one
day, which required at that time an equal, or greater, amount of deductive
reasoning and sound forensic investigation to solve. Sixty-four of those
murders might be case-filed under the name, "The perplexing Burlingame
Endgame Murders," named after the command pilot of the American Airlines
Flight 77, and the fifty-eight passengers, and other five members of the crew,
on-board the Boeing 757, which, according to the federal government, was
allegedly flown into the west wall of the Pentagon at allegedly 9:37 a.m. on
9/11 by an Arab hijacker, Hani Hanjour.
My thought processes were acutely stimulated recently while
listening to the Larry O'Connor Show, on WMAL, 105.9 FM, on Tuesday September
11, 2017. During that radio show, I was intrigued, if not very puzzled, by the
statements of Debra Burlingame, the younger sister of the deceased Flight 77
pilot, Charles Burlingame, about what supposedly happened on September 11,
2001, at the Pentagon. Debra, supposedly a veteran lawyer, has, since 9/11,
continually parroted the federal version of what happened to Flight 77, a
scheduled American Airlines Boeing 757 jet flight from Washington, DC to Los
Angles, California being hijacked in-flight and flown by the high-jacker,
Hanjour, into the Pentagon, insisting that her brother, and the other 63 crew
and passengers who were listed on an American Airlines Flight 77 manifest, were
killed when the jet airliner made impact with the Pentagon's western wall at,
supposedly, 450 mph at about 60 feet above the ground. What is utterly baffling
about these alleged facts is why Debra has supported, for nearly sixteen-years,
a series of assertions about the death of her dear brother, which could not
have possibly occurred due to scientific impossibility.
Since 9/11, many scientifically "correct" facts
about what "really" happened at the Pentagon on that awful day have
emerged from thorough forensic and scientific examinations and analyses of the
dubious facts alleged by the federal government immediately after the Pentagon
incident and, later, in its published 500-plus page tome, "The Report of
9/11 Commission." As a former deputy sheriff for the San Diego County
Sheriff's Department, I graduated from the 72nd San Diego County Sheriff's
Academy in June 1985 after an intense exposure to criminal forensics. Before
that, I had studied inorganic chemistry for one year in an engineering program
at Tyler Junior College (TJC), in Tyler, Texas, and, after completing a
baccalaureate degree at U.T. Tyler, I completed my first, and only, year of law
school at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, in San Diego, California. Later, in
1992, I took an M.A. Degree from the University of Texas at Tyler, which
included a graduate-level course in forensic chemistry. Hence, I came to view
the events, and federally alleged facts, at the Pentagon with the eyes of a
suspicious forensically trained cop, which led me to see a completely different
set of facts, as I will set forth in this article.
Invariably, when large military or commercial jet aircraft
crash into mountains, into the ground, and into buildings and skyscrapers the
crashes of these airplanes leave a great deal of wreckage, especially engine
component wreckage. The composite structure of a Boeing 757 contains ten-tons
of titanium and steel engine components, which should have been quite visible
after such an aircraft crashed into the western wall of the Pentagon, and the
damaging impact of those engine parts should have caused the grassy well-kept
grounds around, and near, the crash site to be greatly disturbed, gouged, and
plainly messed-up. Yet, the facts show that the first media news crew to arrive
at the Pentagon site directly after the alleged crash, a CNN news-crew
presented a seventy-second broadcast wherein the CNN reporter, Jamie McIntyre,
stated that he "did not see a crashed Boeing 757 jet airliner on the west
side of the Pentagon, where the wall was damaged." He had flatly stated
that "if there was a crash of a large jet, it must have been short of the
Pentagon, for the wreckage that is on the Pentagon grounds must have been that
belonging to some type of much smaller aircraft." In the news-clip,
McIntyre looked plainly confused, and that seventy-second broadcast via CNN was
never again shown on national television on, or after, 9/11. Thank goodness for
the invention of the DVR, for if recording devices across the nation, in the
living rooms of millions of television watchers, had not been running at that
moment, that television broadcast segment would have been lost to history, and,
in all probability, the existence of it would have been denied by CNN and the
federal government. Jamie McIntyre's subsequent denial, in 2002, of what he had
reported seeing at the Pentagon came in early 2002, when concerned citizens who
had seen and heard his short-lived news-flash began questioning the federally
alleged facts. The denial by McIntyre about what he had seen and heard on the
morning of 9/11 was clearly coerced through some type of intimidation; as much
as was the 1947 denial statement of U.S. Air Force Major Jesse Martel, the Air
Force intelligence officer who had first stated that he had clearly seen the
remains of a crashed flying saucer near Roswell, New Mexico. He had later
confessed that had been ordered by a commanding Air Force general to appear in
an officially published Air Force picture and say that what he had seen was
from the crash of a weather balloon, instead of what he had really seen. A
movie was subsequently made about Martel's denial, featuring Martin Sheen as a
reporter who had found and interviewed Jesse Martel at an Army Air Corps
reunion.
Another startling factor that enters into the Flight 77
conundrum is the fact that the "only" evidence for the hijacking of
the Boeing 757 was the alleged cell phone calls to Theodore "Ted"
Olson, the USDOJ's solicitor general, from his wife, the well-known CNN
correspondent Barbara Olson, supposedly during the flight of AA 77. Olson had
reported that his wife called him twice from Flight 77. Borrowing from Chapter
5 of Dr. David Ray Griffin's 2011 book, "9/11 Ten Years Later: When state
Crimes Against Democracy Succeed," "Chapter 5 turns to the chief
method through which the (conspiratorial) perpetrators convinced the American
people that the attacks had been orchestrated by Muslims: the apparent phone
calls from the 9/11 planes, through which Americans were first told that Middle
Eastern men had hijacked four airliners. This information was provided by a
leading member of the Bush-Cheney administration, the Department of Justice's
solicitor general, Theodore "Ted" Olson, who told CNN, and hence the
world, that his wife, well-known CNN correspondent Barbara Olson, informed him
that her plane, American Airlines 77, had been hijacked by men armed with
knives and box-cutters. In 2006, it became public knowledge (by means of the
FBI's evidence provided for the trial for Zacarias Moussaoui) that Ted Olson's
report - that his wife had talked to him twice from AA 77 - was not true. This
could hardly have been more important, given the fact that the alleged phone
calls had provided the evidence that the planes had been hijacked, combined
with the fact that the first and most important conveyor of this reported
evidence was Ted Olson. And yet the American media, which have the
responsibility of reporting the information to the American public have never
reported the FBI's acknowledgment that the Olson calls never happened. This
chapter also treats other evidence that the "phone calls from the
planes" never happened."
As far as actual pictures, or video camera footage, showing a
Boeing 757 flying toward the Pentagon, circling the Pentagon in the sky, and
flying from the west at 60 feet above the ground into the Pentagon's western
wall, there are none; except one that was released by the federal government
over three years after 9/11 showing only the "extremely unidentifiable
nose" of some type of aircraft pointed toward the western Pentagon wall;
which was, and still is, totally inadequate in determining that it was a Boeing
757. There were, however, working video cameras installed at an operating Citgo
service station adjacent to Pentagon, and on a high floor of a nearby hotel,
which were aimed at the sky where the 757 jet had allegedly approached the
Pentagon. The tapes for these particular cameras were suspiciously seized by
the FBI not more than ten minutes after whatever hit the Pentagon had done its
damage, and have never been revealed to the American public. Currently, the FBI
claims that "there were never any such tapes, and, if there were, they
cannot be found." These suspicious facts make the (only) two eye-witness
statements for the federal story, which claim to have seen a Boeing 757
approaching the Pentagon, highly dubious; for if there were two reputable
people who saw the plane, there must have been many more who saw the same
thing. Now, about what spokes-people for the federal government, people from
the NIST, the FAA, and the FBI, said about the wreckage of the Boeing 757,
which should have been very visible on the Pentagon grounds after such a crash
on 9/11. During those weeks, months, and years following 9/11, federal representatives
stated over-and-over, with straight faces, that the entire jet aircraft, the
entire Boeing 757 fuselage, air-frame, and the ten-tons of titanium and steel
engine parts were totally "vaporized" by the fiery heat produced from
the crash of the jet into the Pentagon wall.
Well, I've seen the pictures of the wreckage of crashed U.S.
Air Force C-141 Starlifters, when the aircraft and the four large jet engines
crashed into mountains and the ground at approximately 500 mph., and there were
great amounts of engine wreckage remaining. You see, the JP-4 kerosene jet fuel
fire created in the crashs of large jet aircraft will cause those aircraft to
burn at no more than 850 degrees Fahrenheit. For steel and titanium to melt,
much less vaporize, there must a temperature of more than 2,000 degrees. In the
real crash of a Boeing 757 jet airliner into a brick/concrete wall, a fire
would be created that would burn at no more than 850 degrees, and an 850 degree
fire would not cause steel and titanium to vaporize, much less melt. For an
aircraft to vaporize in a crash, the fire and heat must be, at least, 10,000
degrees, since all matter must go from a solid state, to a liquid state, and to
a gaseous state through stages of elemental change. For pieces of steel and titanium
to instantaneously transform in a gas, or vaporize (bypassing the liquid stage)
the temperature must be extreme, and in some cases, greater than the heat
created by the most potent chemical accelerants known to man.
Therefore, there is no reasonable doubt that if a Boeing 757
had crashed into the Pentagon's western wall, a great amount of wreckage would
have remained, which makes CNN reporter Jamie McIntyre's first, suddenly
disappeared, television report a correct observation of the Pentagon at approximately
9:30 a.m. on the morning of 9/11. So, if the American Airlines Flight 77, from
Dulles to LAX, did not crash into the Pentagon, what caused the 16-foot gaping
hole in the Pentagon wall and the homicides that occurred during the melee; and
what happened to the real Flight 77 that left Dulles at 8:20 a.m. on 9/11? The
years of hard investigatory work done by noted engineers, physicists, and
forensic experts, who have freely contributed their efforts to the ongoing
pursuit of truth by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org),
have produced some astounding results that are beyond dispute. Some other type
of airborne missile or much smaller aircraft was remotely projected or flown
into the Pentagon wall.
The very obvious lies and deceptions that were made parts of
the 200 million dollar federal 9/11 investigation and its lackluster product,
"The Report of the 9/11 Commission, convey to the reasonable human mind a
particularly sinister depiction of what could have been nothing less than the
horrible results of criminal conspiracy. The "Report's" particularly
incriminating omission of any mention of the complete collapse of the Solomon
Building, WTC Building 7, at free-fall speed in a manner identical to remote
controlled demolition at approximately 5:15 p.m. on 9/11, is a fact that
contributes to the verbal testimonies of numerous eye-witnesses, who normally
worked on different floors of that particular building; that the federal
employees of the CIA office, on the 10th floor of Building 7, were busily
involved in the operation of a peculiar, obviously secret, project during the
morning and early afternoon hours of 9/11, and that they, and all the other
building occupants were suddenly evacuated from the Building at approximately
4:15 p.m., for some reason unknown to the occupants. One of the witnesses had
heard that Building 7 was going to be "pulled," a term used in the
process of "controlled demolition."
The deductive conclusions formed by AE911Truth.org
investigators were that WTC Building 7 was the CIA/NSA command center for all
of the 9/11 conspiracy implementation operations (for the WTC, the Pentagon,
and wherever else operations were being conducted). Confidential informants for
AE911Truth.org have provided information that intelligence agencies of the
federal government, mainly the CIA and the NSA, were responsible for the
collapses of the WTC Towers and the events at the Pentagon. Is this hard to
believe? Of course it is! What rational member of the American electorate would
believe that the federal government would conspiratorially orchestrate the
murders of over 3,000 innocent human beings? That was the expected human
reaction on which the federal government agencies involved in the conspiracy
were counting. So, extending the reasonable deductions beyond the collapses of
the WTC Towers and Building 7 to Flight 77, the reasonable person must consider
that if 3,000 innocent human lives perished needlessly in New York, why would
the lives of the 58 passengers and six crew members of Flight 77, plus those
people slain at the Pentagon, matter to the federal government?
Do you suppose that Wendy Burlingame, the 33 year old
daughter of Charles Burlingame, had started to deductively put two-and-two
together by 2006, in order to conclude that Flight 77 had not crashed into the
Pentagon, but, instead, had been flown from Dulles to some unknown
out-of-the-way airstrip, the passengers deplaned by CIA/NSA agents, and
executed in cold blood? Is it reasonable, or merely fantasy, to suspect that
Wendy was subsequently murdered in an arson fire that consumed her in her U.S.
Army veteran boyfriend's apartment on December 6, 2006, to permanently quiet
her vocalized suspicions and allegations? The arson investigators who
officially probed the fire included two, unnamed, federal agents, according to
the Guttenberg, New Jersey City Fire Department, which had responded to the
two-alarm fire. In most cases, a fire-chief of a particular city has the sole
responsibility of publicly reporting that a fire was not the result of arson,
but, in this particular case, the Hudson County District Attorney, Edward
Defazio, took the role of stating publicly for the record that "no
accelerant was used in the fire" and that arson could be ruled-out. Hence,
there must have been an original suspicion of arson and criminal activity
emanating from the county D.A. that surrounded the unusual conflagration.
Several independent investigators certainly thought so, which leads the
reasonable person to suspect that the fire might have been deliberately set, in
some manner, to murder Wendy Burlingame; since the crime of murder is defined
as the unlawful killing of one human by another with malice aforethought, or
criminal negligence.
Like I said at the beginning of this article, pure unadulterated
scientific fact will, in nearly all thorough murder investigations, eventually
trump conspiratorial lies and misrepresentations about speculative events and
happenings. Inquiring human minds with knowledge of physical science and
forensics, minds that are deductive and intuitive, will always succeed in
ferreting-out the unscientific and illogical discrepancies in a criminal
investigation, even if false public perception, created by the media, keeps
those conclusions from being believed. The willingness of the human mind to
accept fact over contrived fiction, and the propaganda that promotes I false
perception is the crux of the issue. The investigation of the suspicious deaths
of truth-revealing witnesses and whistle-blowers in the wake of a criminal
conspiracy promotes a cogent linkage of evidence that will lead, directly or
indirectly, to the identification of the conspirators. As such, to add to the
suspicious death of Wendy Burlingame, the mysterious death of Beverly Eckert,
who lost her husband on 9/11, thickens the plot and adds weight to the evidence
for conspiracy. Beverly, like Wendy, didn't buy into the federal explanation
for 9/11, and was one of the original 9/11 victims' families who organized to
seek truthful disclosure about what really happened to the WTC Twin Towers and
Building 7. According to Beverly, before she was killed she was offered a
considerable amount of money from agents of the federal government to remain
silent about her 9/11 concerns, but she refused the money and was adamant about
not remaining quiet. A week before she died in a very mysterious commuter
airplane crash, on February 12, 2009, Beverly Eckert met with Barack Obama at
the White House representing 9/11 victims' families advocating a new full
fact-disclosing investigation of 9/11. Was Beverly murdered, along with the
other human beings in that commuter plane crash, by the federal government to
silence her persistent 9/11 petitions?
The mysterious death of Kenneth Johannemann, a janitor for
both of the WTC Twin Towers, who was working on 9/11, was another incident that
smacks of conspiracy. Kenneth was working in the north WTC Twin Tower on
September 11, 2001, when he distinctly heard explosions coming from the tower
basement and from upper-floors of the tower. In fact, Kenneth rescued a victim
of full-body burns from the basement explosion, which occurred at the base, and
not the top, of the North Tower. On October 31, 2008, seven years after 9/11,
Kenneth was found dead, the victim of a gunshot to the head. A note was found
saying that Kenneth was depressed after being evicted from his residence; but
Johannemann's large caring family testified that one of his cousins had offered
him a place to live, and that he wasn't a person prone to depression. According
to all that knew him, Kenneth was not depressed in the days and weeks leading
up his death, and regularly told his account of what he had scene and heard in
the North WTC Tower to public gatherings. Perhaps that was his fatal error,
stating the truth of really happened in the North Tower on 9/11. An article by
Montreal journalist and writer Craig McKee regarding William Rodriguez, a
fellow-janitor at the WTC, and friend of Kenneth Johannemann, indicates that
he, both, saw and heard exactly what Kenneth had observed on the morning of
9/11. A portion of the article is included below:
"No matter how well known he (Rodriguez) is within the
9/11 Truth movement (in fact he's one of its best known figures), very few
others have heard the things he has to say - things that make the purveyors of
the official federal story very nervous. That's because if what he reports is
true, then the official story can't be true. That official version contends
that airplane impacts and the resulting fires were solely responsible for the collapse
of the Twin Towers. But if his account of explosions in the basement of the
North Tower is true, then there must be a great deal more to the story. In the
documentary, "9/11 Mysteries," Rodriguez describes what happened
while he was in the building's sub-basement, level B1: "All of the sudden,
we heard a huge explosion. It was an explosion that came from under my feet,
meaning that it came from the sub levels between B2 and B3." Rodriguez
adds that after the basement explosion, he heard the impact of the impact that
has been reported to be Flight 11 hitting the North Tower. "And there was
a huge explosion at the top of the building. You could hear the difference from
the bottom and all the way to the top. The one from the top, which was actually
seconds after, was very far away. The one in the basement was pretty loud and
you felt your actual feet moving with the floor. There was a tremor through the
walls, that the walls cracked and the false ceiling totally collapsed."
Therefore, in summation, ALL of the true relevant and
material facts surrounding what actually happened on 9/11, at the Pentagon and
in New York City, totally conflict with the federal version of the pernicious
happenings reported on public television by the National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST), and published in the "Report of the 9/11
Commission" and on national cable television, which cost the American
taxpayers over 120 million dollars from start to finish. Yet, do you expect a
group of shadowy, pragmatic, and sadistic federal conspirators to freely own-up
to their heinous crimes and the mass murders they committed; to finally get
some conscience and make public confessions? No, you can't expect them to do
that, but you can expect them to make errors in judgment in attempting to cover
their tracks and eliminate all of the incriminating evidence linking them to a
9/11 criminal conspiracy. The bottom line crux of this article is that a Boeing
757 jet airliner, carrying 58 passengers and 6 crew members of American Airlines
Flight 77, did not crash into the Pentagon wall, and that two Boeing 767 jet
airliners, American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175, were not
flown into the North and South WTC Twin Towers. Instead, carefully constructed
jet drones closely resembling Boeing 767 jet airliners were used, which were
built over a two-year period by private federal contractors working secretly
for the CIA/NSA. And the kicker was that the federal contractors had no idea
about the real purpose for the secretly-built drones. As for the total
free-fall collapse of the two WTC Twin Towers and the WTC Building 7, the three
super-structures were completely collapsed through the use of controlled
demolition using an incendiary super-heat producing explosive called military-grade
nano-thermite.
Until a very indignantly vocal minority of the American
national electorate (the aggregate U.S. citizen voters over 18 years of age),
or an equally clamerous majority of them, are convinced of the true and correct
facts about the mass-murders committed on 9/11, the truth cannot be realized.
These murders which were perpetrated by federal conspirators to implement a
neo-conservative agenda for a very fascist "new American 21st
Century," planned several years before 9/11. By blaming 9/11on radical
Islamists and securing the passage of the unconstitutional Patriot Act, the
federal government instigated a continuous unwinnable state-of-war against the
"terrorism" of its own making thereby drastically changing the
American republic after 9/11 into a nation of People coerced by continual fear.
And it will continue to plod along in apathetic ignorance as it did in the
aftermath of Pearl Harbor. It took nearly 35 years, after the fact, for the
American public to accept the sordid reality that Franklin Roosevelt had
deliberately concocted the plan to kill over 4,000 American soldiers, marines,
airmen, and sailors in the Japanese attack on December 7, 1941 in the name of
pragmatism. The Japanese attack was a harrowing surprise to the men and women
in uniform at Pearl Harbor on that fateful morning, but not for FDR, who knew
about the pending attack 72 hours prior to it happening. He could have warned
the Pearl Harbor Naval Command about it. But he didn't, because he had promised
his cousin, Winston Churchill, in 1939, that he would see to it that the United
States entered the European war against Adolf Hitler's Germany. It was, then, a
devious backdoor to war! History has proven this to be the gospel truth, but
that truth really hasn't mattered to a late 20th Century and early 21st Century
American electorate, who, it seems, don't really care about the scourge of
conspiracy. Nearly sixteen years have elapsed since 9/11, and the false federal
propaganda and the progressive media have dominated the duped minds of a large
percentage of the current American electorate to cause them to believe the
federal explanation for 9/11. Over a hundred million American men and women
turn 18 years of age, and become members of the electorate, every calendar
year. Will another sixteen years inexorably elapse before the awful truth is
known? Or will it ever be known. God only knows!
The Fifty States of the USA are guaranteed the power, and
right, to police themselves under the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution's
Bill of Rights. They are allowed under Article 5, of the Constitution, the
power to convene together as State Legislatures in a Constitutional Convention
to amend the U.S. Constitution in ways not permittable under federal
jurisdiction. In like manner, the States have the collective power, under the
10th Amendment, to investigate, together, crimes and conspiracies against the
People of the USA and the U.S. Constitution, which have not been properly and
legally investigated, and adjudicated by the federal government. To date, this
has not happened, but the States have the power and the impending necessity to
re-investigate the tragic murders that occurred on September 11, 2001 in New
York City, at the Pentagon, wherever else innocent Americans and foreign nationals
were murdered on that particular day. Instead of federal politicians presiding
over such an investigation, there should be a team of seasoned State-appointed
homicide investigators and detectives, city police chiefs, forensic experts,
and forensic scientists, that should ferret-out the relevant and material facts
surrounding 9/11 mass-murders in order to place blame on the REAL culprits,
whomever they might turn-out to be. If it is proven that the federal government
was collectively responsible for the murders, the individual federal
conspirators, regardless of federal position and/or status, should be indicted
by a State-convened grand jury, tried by a State-sponsored supreme court, and,
if convicted of their crimes, be sentenced to death by hanging. This is only
the application of proper criminal justice.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/expert/Norton_Nowlin/24711
No comments:
Post a Comment